Vol.
II, Issue 1 • Winter
2004
An
Interview with Kiran Bedi • Voices
from the Inside • Dear
Abhi • News
_________________________________________________
An
Interview with Kiran Bedi, Co-Commissioner of Police, Delhi,
India
Conducted
by Bill Karelis on behalf of the Shambhala Prison Community,
Delhi Police Headquarters, 31 October 2002
Bill
Karelis: Madame Bedi, you are very famous internationally
for your humanitarian work and also for working with meditation,
both with prison inmates and with police. Could you give
us any advice about how to apply these principles, or the
importance of such principles, in our work in the United
States?
Kiran
Bedi: As administrators and organizers, or as trainers
and teachers, if education goes beyond professional skills
and entails a larger concept, enabling an environment of
personal skills, I think one would naturally look for options
like we did, which included meditation programs. And that's
what I have tried to do in my police training assignment
over the last four years.
Whichever
police officer comes to a police training college encounters
an environment enabling him to self-audit, to personally look
within himself, [to see] whether he is implementing or fulfilling
the cause of policing. He examines the mission statement with
which he came, the mission statement to which he swore, to
serve the community and his department, and he examines whether
or not he's gone astray, changed track, or changed his working
or professional life in the negative sense. He may still be
wearing a uniform, but his priorities, objectives, or personal
mission statements may have changed. He may be only looking
to get his promotion. He may be doing anything to oblige his
seniors or curry favors with the politicians. He may even be
cutting corners to oblige some people in the higher ranks in
the community. So, is he doing that – or is he fulfilling
the original mission statement to be fair to all, to be just
to all, to be humane to all, to be kind to all, to be firm
equally to all, and to be impartial?
It
is from this consideration that we brought self-audit programs
called "reflective programs" into police training.
I
found that the training instantly makes a difference. The evaluative
feedback forms we have used for the last four years have always
confirmed that any education which is without the concept of
self-reflection is cut and dry. It makes robots of people,
but it never makes human beings of people. That is why vipassana
meditation and many other programs became so integral to my
police training. Over the last four years, no fewer than six
thousand police officers in the Delhi Police have gone through
vipassana meditation programs. Six thousand! We did one course
with twelve hundred police officers in one shot, all trainees
and new recruits, out of which we made a documentary film,
called Self-Policing. Doing
Time, Doing Vipassana [a well-known documentary
on Madame Bedi's work with meditation as a warden of the largest
prison in Delhi] depicts the program in the Indian prison,
and Self-Policing also shows and depicts the program for police
officers – how important it is for education to integrate
reflective education, self-audit. There are different methodologies,
wonderful programs by which one can get inspired to self-audit,
to self-reflect, to look within. That's what vipassana stands
for, looking within, in a special way. This is [the nature
of] the programs we're talking about.
Now
it's a settled program, and it's become in-house. Many states
in the government of India have issued circulars to say that
if police officers want to opt for a program like vipassana
meditation, they can get duty leave to go to it. For Delhi
Police training, we have an in-house training center, a vipassana
meditation center, where one course for fifty-five officers
is held every month. Volunteers from all units of the Delhi
Police
come and sit and do the [course]; in fact one course is on
even now. We have a massive library of feedback from these
six thousand people who have been trained. Everybody documents
in the beginning: Who did he hear about it from? Why did he
volunteer? Is there any compulsion to do it? What is he hoping
to learn? And at the end of the course, he documents what he
learned. Taking those responses one by one, almost ninety-nine
percent say that they're glad that they did the course. Some
say they regret that they didn't do it earlier. Many want to
come back to it, to repeat the course at regular intervals.
And the great majority say how amazingly they've learned lessons
of life which they had so badly forgotten.
BK: So
it seems to be very, very effective.
KB: Absolutely.
In fact, I couldn’t have found a better way. It's basically
returning human beings to humanity. Through this course they
realize the humanity in themselves, and their thick skins became
sensitive once again, and they can vibrate and they can feel.
The thick skins melted through these courses and the people
became humane again. In human beings, to be humane is so important.
I think that over the years such work hardens you up. You take
certain things for granted; you say, "Well, pain has to
be suffered and policing is tough, you've got to suffer it
out," or [to the criminals], "If you've committed
a crime, you've got to go through it." Well, yes, everyone
has to go through it, but it can be less painful. A police
officer can be kinder while implementing the law. This doesn't
mean that you let people go free, but when you're arresting
people you realize you don't have to hurt them, and you don't
have to use language which people never forgive you for. That's
the return of humanity.
BK: Did
you find this approach also to be effective with prison inmates
in your previous work?
KB: I
found this program to be effective for all. And the more stressful
the situation, the more beneficial it is. In prisons, of course,
it's a highly stressed situation. The inmates don't want to
be where they are. They are deprived of their liberty, they
are being punished, they are personally punishing themselves,
and they are full of all kinds of negative emotions, like revenge
and anger, and they are often partial to spitting out their
anger, or expressing it by committing another crime. Being
unforgiving, nursing all the kinds of unforgiveness, a person
will be partial to expressing his feelings in a negative way.
The more stressed a situation, the more helpful the meditation
programs are. What the programs do, in the end of the day,
is to relax you down, to break you down to your basic human
feelings. They make you connect between your mind and the body;
they make you reflect on what your mind was making your body
do. You look at your mind, and say: What kind of human being
were you? What kind of sensations were you nursing and nurturing?
And what kind of devils were you creating within yourself?
And you see you could be an angel as well, who could think
the right things and want to do the right things. So the inmates
tried to do the programs; they brought me their reflection,
meditation.
As
the prisoners were heavily stressed in prison, so are the police
very much under stress to deliver – to give results,
to seek better assignments, to move up in the hierarchy. There
is a shortage of time, and the pressure of families. That life
is very demanding on mind and body. As I've said, the more
stressed you are, the more difficult your circumstances, the
greater the benefit of the meditation program. The stress is
highest in the prisons, and high in the police. It is equally
high in executive assignments [as it is among the rank-and-file]
where the company revolves around your policies, and your accountability
and responsibility is so high.
BK: It
sounds like a road to greater justice, no matter which side
we're looking from.
KB: Which
is a road to a just society. It's a road to a peaceful society.
It's a road towards a non-violent society. It's a road to a
more compassionate society. It's a road to a value-based society.
It's a road towards a composed society, and it's a road towards
greater family relationships.
BK: Thank
you. Is there anything else that you would like to communicate
to our audience, which is mostly in the United States?
KB: You
know, I find that we in the world are getting divided into
two worlds. One is a world which promotes non-violence, and
the other which promotes violence, through violent words, violent
deeds, violent gestures, violent expressions. By non-violence
one doesn't mean that we don't act – we do act. It's
not that we don't look after our safety – we must look
after our safety. But let us not do anything now which increases
the world of violence. We must do everything to increase the
population of non-violence. Therefore, while we take care of
our security, while we do justice to people who've been on
the wrong side of the law, before we use any word, gesture,
action, we must do nothing deliberately, consciously, which
increases the world of violence.
We
already have a very large share of people worldwide who believe
in violence. Therefore, I think we need to work consciously
together, while upholding the law, while treating the law properly,
to do nothing which aggravates violence. Because anything which
aggravates violence is going to come back to the aggravator – directly
or indirectly, immediately or later on. That's the law of nature.
We can't escape it. Therefore, that's the message I would like
to give and share.
I
often take the opportunity to say this – that we belong
to two worlds, one world which believes and practices non-violence,
and the other, maybe wanting non-violence, but aggravating
violence. We have to become very conscious, because we are
suffering already, and terrorism is a byproduct of that "hate
politics." So we must do nothing which now and hereafter
encourages hate or revenge.
But
by saying this, I'm not implying that we become passive and
give the message, "You can come and hit me, and you can
kill me, and you can do what you want." No, we do whatever
is necessary to defend ourselves but we do it in a manner which
reduces violence, rather than increases violence.
BK: Do
you see an increasing role for international cooperation and
communication in this area?
KB: Yes.
BK: Do
you think it is possible?
KB: It
is absolutely possible, provided we genuinely believe and think
like this. But we must genuinely do so. Because it's not the
world conferences, it's not documents, it's not proposals,
it's not resolutions, it is genuineness which will take us
to a larger population of non-violence. We must judge nations'
development by their belief in non-violence, rather than judging
them on Gross Domestic Product and industrial growth. I would
love to regard a family as a rich family, a nation as a rich
nation, if it is rich in values of non-violence. We need to
standardize this – we need to upgrade the value of standardization
of how we judge a nation. We only judge a nation by its capital
wealth. We do not [usually] judge a nation by its love for
non-violence, spread of non-violence, spread of love and brotherhood.
The more genuinely we believe in this view, the more it will
be possible. There is absolutely a need for spreading the
word and coming together globally – and not talking,
but practicing non-violence.
BK: Thank
you very much for your words of wisdom.
KB: Thank
you.
Madame Bedi's Website: www.kiranbedi.com/main.htm
Back to
Top